Fechar

@MastersThesis{Silva:2013:AvMoWR,
               author = "Silva, Adaiana Francisca Gomes da",
                title = "Avalia{\c{c}}{\~a}o do modelo WRF ao perfil do vento no Centro 
                         de Lan{\c{c}}amento de Alc{\^a}ntara",
               school = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
                 year = "2013",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
                month = "2013-02-27",
             keywords = "engenharia do vento, radiossondagem, simula{\c{c}}{\~a}o 
                         num{\'e}rica, lan{\c{c}}amento de foguetes, micrometeorologia, 
                         wind engineering, radiosounding, numerical simulation, rocket 
                         launching, micrometeorology.",
             abstract = "Este trabalho tem como objetivo avaliar a capacidade de um modelo 
                         num{\'e}rico regional de mesoescala (no caso, o modelo WRF) em 
                         representar o escoamento atmosf{\'e}rico da regi{\~a}o do Centro 
                         de Lan{\c{c}}amento de Alc{\^a}ntara (CLA), possibilitando seu 
                         uso para previs{\~a}o do vento quando em ocasi{\~o}es de 
                         lan{\c{c}}amentos naquela base, fazendo tamb{\'e}m uma 
                         an{\'a}lise sazonal ao comportamento do modelo. A 
                         motiva{\c{c}}{\~a}o deste estudo {\'e} o impacto direto e 
                         profundo que as caracter{\'{\i}}sticas do vento podem ter na 
                         trajet{\'o}ria de um foguete em lan{\c{c}}amento, podendo 
                         desvi{\'a}-lo, causar imprevistos e at{\'e} mesmo acidentes. 
                         Previs{\~o}es do vento de 72 horas foram feitas a partir de 
                         condi{\c{c}}{\~o}es iniciais fornecidas pelo \textit{Global 
                         Forecasting System} (GFS), do {National Centers for Environmental 
                         Prediction} (NCEP). As rodadas foram configuradas com tr{\^e}s 
                         dom{\'{\i}}nios aninhados e resolu{\c{c}}{\~o}es horizontais 
                         de 9, 3 e 1 km. Simula{\c{c}}{\~o}es foram iniciadas {\`a}s 00 
                         e {\`a}s 12 UTC para o per{\'{\i}}odo de 16 a 26 de setembro de 
                         2008, esta{\c{c}}{\~a}o seca, e de 19 a 25 de mar{\c{c}}o de 
                         2010, esta{\c{c}}{\~a}o chuvosa da regi{\~a}o, 
                         per{\'{\i}}odos para os quais se disp{\~o}e de alta densidade 
                         de dados observados (radiossondagens). As sa{\'{\i}}das do 
                         modelo foram confrontadas contra observa{\c{c}}{\~o}es 
                         atrav{\'e}s de tr{\^e}s {\'{\i}}ndices estat{\'{\i}}sticos: 
                         vi{\'e}s, erro quadr{\'a}tico m{\'e}dio e {\'{\i}}ndice de 
                         concord{\^a}ncia de Willmott (d), calculados a cada 6 horas. 
                         Foram realizados testes de sensibilidade nos quais foram variados 
                         e comparados diferentes par{\^a}metros din{\^a}micos e 
                         f{\'{\i}}sicos, sejam eles: tamanhos de dom{\'{\i}}nios, 
                         n{\'u}mero de n{\'{\i}}veis verticais, \textit{spin-up time} e 
                         parametriza{\c{c}}{\~o}es de Camada Limite Planet{\'a}ria. Os 
                         testes mostraram pouca sensibilidade do modelo com 
                         rela{\c{c}}{\~a}o ao tamanho dos dom{\'{\i}}nios e ao 
                         \textit{spin-up time}, com diferen{\c{c}}as na ordem da segunda 
                         ou terceira casa decimal para d e da primeira ou segunda casa 
                         decimal para os erros. Mas, com rela{\c{c}}{\~a}o ao n{\'u}mero 
                         de n{\'{\i}}veis verticais, diferen{\c{c}}as de at{\'e} 1 m/s 
                         nos erros foram favor{\'a}veis {\`a} utiliza{\c{c}}{\~a}o de 
                         mais n{\'{\i}}veis verticais, no caso 42. 6 horas ficaram 
                         definidas como tempo de ajuste, descartadas. Nas 
                         parametriza{\c{c}}{\~o}es, as diferen{\c{c}}as entre os 
                         {\'{\i}}ndices dos quatro esquemas testados (YSU, ETA, ACM2 e 
                         MYNN2,5) tamb{\'e}m foram muito pequenas (primeira ou segunda 
                         casa decimal) e os mais adequados foram definidos a partir de uma 
                         avalia{\c{c}}{\~a}o te{\'o}rica. Em fun{\c{c}}{\~a}o do 
                         {\'{\i}}ndice de Willmott, o modelo se mostrou razo{\'a}vel 
                         para representar o perfil vertical do vento, dentro de suas 
                         limita{\c{c}}{\~o}es, n{\~a}o mostrando diferen{\c{c}}a em seu 
                         desempenho entre as esta{\c{c}}{\~o}es seca ou chuvosa, com 
                         valores m{\'a}ximos na ordem de 0,90 e m{\'e}dios da ordem de 
                         0,70. N{\~a}o foi poss{\'{\i}}vel obter um intervalo de horas 
                         padr{\~a}o de todas as simula{\c{c}}{\~o}es em que a qualidade 
                         de previs{\~a}o fosse melhor ou pior. ABSTRACT: This study aims 
                         to assess the ability of a regional mesoscale numerical model (in 
                         this case, the WRF model) to represent the atmospheric flow in the 
                         region of Alcantara Launching Center (CLA), allowing its use for 
                         predicting the wind on occasions of rocket launching, also doing 
                         an analysis to the seasonal behavior of the model. The motivation 
                         of this study is the direct and profound impact that the 
                         characteristics of wind can have on the trajectory of a rocket 
                         launch, as deflect it and even cause unforeseen accidents. 72 
                         hours wind forecasts were made from initial conditions provided by 
                         the Global Forecasting System (GFS), of the National Centers for 
                         Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The configuration of the runs was 
                         three grid nested with a horizontal resolution of 9, 3 and 1 km. 
                         Simulations were initiated at 00 and 12 UTC for the period from 16 
                         to 26 September 2008, dry season, and from 19 to 25 March 2010, 
                         the rainy season in the region, periods for which we have high 
                         data density observed (radiosonde). The model outputs were 
                         compared against observations using three statistical indices: 
                         bias, mean squared error and Willmott agreement index, calculated 
                         every 6 hours. Sensitivity tests were made, in which were varied 
                         and compared different physical and dynamic parameters, they are: 
                         domain sizes, number of vertical levels, spin-up time and 
                         Planetary Boundary Layer parameterizations. Tests showed little 
                         sensitivity of the model with respect to the domain size and to 
                         the spin-up time, with differences on the order of the second or 
                         third decimal place for d and the first or the second decimal 
                         place for errors. But about the number of vertical levels, 
                         differences of up to 1 m/s on errors were in favor of using more 
                         vertical levels, in the case 42. 6 hours were defined as spin-up 
                         time, discarded. In the parameterizations, the differences between 
                         the indices of the four tested schemes (YSU, ETA, ACM2 and 
                         MYNN2.5) were also very small (first or second decimal place) and 
                         the most suitable were defined from a theoretical evaluation. 
                         According to the Willmott index, the model was reasonable to 
                         represent the vertical wind profile, within its limitations, 
                         showing no difference in performance between the dry or rainy 
                         seasons, with maximum values on the order of 0.90 and, on the 
                         average, on the order of 0.70. It wasn´t possible to obtain a time 
                         interval pattern of all simulations where quality prediction was 
                         better or worse.",
            committee = "Oyama, Marcos Daisuke (presidente) and Fisch, Gilberto Fernando 
                         (orientador) and Leal Junior, Jo{\~a}o Bosco Ver{\c{c}}osa",
           copyholder = "SID/SCD",
         englishtitle = "WRF model assessment of the wind profile at the Alcantara 
                         Launching Center",
             language = "pt",
                pages = "98",
                  ibi = "8JMKD3MGP7W/3DGJ992",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP7W/3DGJ992",
           targetfile = "publicacao.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "09 maio 2024"
}


Fechar